Life Sciences

Bossier City criminal lawyers understand exactly what needs to be done to help settle debt.

Our qualified’s Life Sciences and Technologies lawyers are experienced in the complex issues related to biotechnology, genomics, and proteomics, and are well equipped to meet our clients needs in this rapidly expanding technological environment.

Many of these lawyers have extensive experience as general counsel for established Life Sciences companies and high-technology start-ups.

We understand the issues that Life Sciences companies face at the ever-evolving intersection of advanced technology, public policy and business development. We counsel and advise our clients on matters such as disclosure requirements, protecting intellectual property and assets, licensing technology, resolving disputes and managing corporate reputation. Because of our broad-based technology expertise, we can counsel clients addressing sophisticated issues in bio-informatics and related technology merging software and hardware concepts.

We are adept at forming alliances and multi-disciplinary practice groups with entities outside the practice of law, to better arrive at the breadth of services required by companies in this complex area.

Corporate and Securities

Our Corporate attorneys advise clients on the formation, acquisition, financing and development of businesses in the Life Sciences industries. We have represented these companies in both the private and public markets.

We advise Boards of Directors regarding acquisitions, joint ventures and partnerships with an eye to protecting company assets with a proactive intellectual property approach, leading to more integrated acquisitions and development strategies. Our qualified lawyers assist our clients with forming alliances, joint ventures, and outsourcing arrangements in the operations of their businesses. We are familiar with the issues in determining rights to gene sequences and the impact on company decision making in acquisitions and other related alliance formation.

We are especially familiar with Regulation FD and have assisted our clients with a number of disclosure issues that have arisen since the regulation became effective. We also have worked with Life Sciences clients and their independent auditors with respect to the SEC’s interpretations of revenue recognition for collaborations and licenses and the impact of those interpretations on company reporting.

We advise our clients on the many aspects of running genomics and biotech businesses, both in the U.S. and in cross-border circumstances.

Last week, Dui lawyer in Montgomery County blogged about a tragic and fatal car accident that was caused by texting and driving. A teenage driver was driving and texting at night. The teenage driver spotted a pedestrian crossing the road but recognized the pedestrian too late. The driver’s attempt to swerve failed and killed the pedestrian. Had the driver not been texting, the car accident may not have happened. This week we have another story that illustrates the dangers of texting and driving. Two guys from Car and Driver magazine tested the thesis of whether texting while driving was more dangerous than drinking and driving. According to Car and Driver, which was more dangerous?

Car and Driver found that texting and driving was more dangerous than drinking and driving. The creators of the experiment used GPS and a data logger to record the speed of the test vehicle, brake-pedal position, and steering angle. A faux brake light was installed on the windshield of the car to imitate a breaking car. Every time the fake brake light turned on, the driver was supposed to apply the brakes. Car and Driver tested two drivers; one young and one old. Both drivers ran test routes that measured their reaction times without interference and then routes that measured their reaction times texting and driving and drinking and driving. brain Gabriel dui lawyer is available to assist in similar cases. The drivers’ texting and driving results were compared to their own original results.

The performance of the young driver showed he was a more dangerous driving while texting. His reaction time traveling at 35 miles per hour without interference was 0.45 seconds. His reaction while reading a text was 0.57, and his reaction time while writing a text was 0.52. His reaction time while impaired was 0.46 seconds. The pattern of the older driver was similar. His base reaction time was 0.57 seconds. His reaction time while reading a text was 1.44 seconds, and his reaction time while texting was 1.36 seconds. When impaired, the older driver’s reaction time was 0.64 seconds.

The reaction numbers can also be calculated to demonstrate how much further the driver’s traveled before stopping. According to Younglove Law Group, it would take both drivers longer to stop while texting. The lesson? To prevent car accidents, drivers should be clear of distractions while behind the wheel, and should obviously not drink and drive.

Car accidents in Flint, Michigan can occur at any time and it’s important to receive help with them.